STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS VS. OTHER INVESTMENT PRODUCTS
We frequently hear from investment people about the rate of return on
structured settlement annuities vs. other investment products. It is
important to keep in mind that these payments, by Federal Statute, are
totally tax-free from any Federal, State, City, Social Security or Medicare
taxation.
The income generated by investment of a large settlement would typically
result in higher tax brackets. Therefore, one would need to earn 35 to 40%
greater rates each and every year throughout a lifetime to equal the same
rate of return as the structured settlement on a net after-tax basis. Please
also keep in mind there are no ongoing fees, commissions, reporting
requirements or additional expenses in connection with these structured
settlements.
If the client has sustained considerable injuries, the "age rated" annuities
often produce a tax equivalent internal rate of return of 10.5% or more,
guaranteed for a lifetime. The average return of stocks from 1926-2002 has
been only between 10 and 12 percent a year (7.7% after taxes), with much more risk.
When comparing rates of return of a structured settlement annuity vs.
another investment, it is important to compare those returns over a period of
time comparable with the life expectancy of the individual claimant. It is also
important to compare the net performance of the investment after fees and
taxes as there are no ongoing fees, commissions, reporting requirements or
additional expenses in connection with the structured settlement annuity.
If the claimant has sustained serious
injuries, "age rated" annuities often produce a higher tax equivalent internal
rate of return guaranteed for a lifetime, with almost no risk.
At a minimum we suggest the claimant consider a portion of their portfolio that
would normally be invested in conservative products such as U.S.
Treasuries, Municipal Bonds, Corporate Bonds, etc. (typically one-third to
one-half of the settlement) be placed in a "structure" as this will improve the
rate of return on these monies due to the tax-free status.
Many financial planners do not understand structured settlements and many
have never experienced a Bear Market. Could the claimant stand to lose
almost 50% of their settlement over a 3 year period if the market declines as
it did in the early 1970's and again in the early 2000's?
Another factor to consider is that life expectancies are increasing at a rate
close to one percent a year, making a person with a 20 year life expectancy at
retirement actually live about 50% longer than the expectancy table reflects.
Could the claimant outlive their settlement...not if it is a lifetime payout in a
structured settlement annuity. If the injury is permanent, the settlement
should be too!
If a trust officer, stockbroker, money manager, or financial planner advises
they can exceed the total amount of payments on a net after-tax basis, have
them issue a letter guaranteeing this statement, as our proposals are
contractually guaranteed by a multi-billion dollar life insurance
corporations.
We will be happy to review any of the proposals offered by financial
advisors.
|